Bug#879687: SA-Exim not compatible with CHUNKING

2019-05-05 Thread Magnus Holmgren
tisdag 24 oktober 2017 kl. 15:53:20 CEST skrev du: > After the analysis by SpamAssassin an email can get a note between > SAtempreject and SApermreject. The mail can pass through the antispam > (according to the Greylisting phase) in which case it will include an > additional header:

Bug#879687: SA-Exim not compatible with CHUNKING

2017-10-24 Thread Jouan Marc
Package: sa-exim Version: 4.2.1-16 After the analysis by SpamAssassin an email can get a note between SAtempreject and SApermreject. The mail can pass through the antispam (according to the Greylisting phase) in which case it will include an additional header: "X-Spam-Report" (result of the