Hi Sylvestre!
On 01/24/2018 02:22 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 01/24/2018 01:44 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
I would prefer rust to move to llvm 5.0 instead.
I would like to get ride of < 5.0 asap.
I fully agree. But is the bump upstream to 5.0 happening any time soon?
The patch h
On 01/24/2018 01:44 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
I would prefer rust to move to llvm 5.0 instead.
I would like to get ride of < 5.0 asap.
I fully agree. But is the bump upstream to 5.0 happening any time soon?
It would be nice to have rustc on sparc64 in Debian to be able to get
more testing fo
On 24/01/2018 10:59, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 10/30/2017 07:42 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> On 30/10/2017 19:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> I am attaching the patch to this bug report. Could you please include it in
>>> the next upload of the llvm-toolchain-4.0 p
Hello!
On 10/30/2017 07:42 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On 30/10/2017 19:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I am attaching the patch to this bug report. Could you please include it in
the next upload of the llvm-toolchain-4.0 package?
Sure, I merged it in the VCS
Any chance the patched llvm
On 30/10/2017 19:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I am attaching the patch to this bug report. Could you please include it in
> the next upload of the llvm-toolchain-4.0 package?
>
Sure, I merged it in the VCS
S
Source: llvm-toolchain-4.0
Version: 1:4.0.1-8
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc64
Hi!
While working on bootstrapping rustc for sparc64, Michael Karcher discovered
that LLVM may generate code where the stack alignment on sparc64 is incorrect
which res
6 matches
Mail list logo
