2017-12-16 18:26 GMT+01:00 Félix Sipma :
> On 2017-12-14 17:45+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2017-12-13 14:55+0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> >>> On 2017-12-02 13:21+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:08:55PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> > On 2017-11-05 21:27+01
On 2017-12-14 17:45+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-12-13 14:55+0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-02 13:21+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:08:55PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> On 2017-11-05 21:27+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> 2017-11-05 21:19 GMT+01:0
On 2017-12-14 17:45+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-12-13 14:55+0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-02 13:21+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:08:55PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> On 2017-11-05 21:27+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> 2017-11-05 21:19 GMT+01:0
>
> On 2017-12-13 14:55+0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> > On 2017-12-02 13:21+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:08:55PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> >>> On 2017-11-05 21:27+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 2017-11-05 21:19 GMT+01:00 Félix Sipma :
> >>
> > node version 8.9.
It would be interesting to have 8.x in experimental to see if the build still
fails. Who knows? We may be lucky :-).
@Jérémy: could you consider uploading this?
On 2017-12-13 14:55+0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> On 2017-12-02 13:21+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:08:55PM
On 2017-12-02 13:21+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:08:55PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
>> On 2017-11-05 21:27+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> 2017-11-05 21:19 GMT+01:00 Félix Sipma :
>
node version 8.9.0 LTS is available upstream. Could you consider packaging
it?
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:08:55PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> On 2017-11-05 21:27+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > 2017-11-05 21:19 GMT+01:00 Félix Sipma :
> >> node version 8.9.0 LTS is available upstream. Could you consider packaging
> >> it?
> > Sure, but nodejs 6.11.x first has to go in testing..
On 2017-11-05 21:27+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 2017-11-05 21:19 GMT+01:00 Félix Sipma :
>
>> Package: nodejs
>> Version: 6.11.4~dfsg-1
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> node version 8.9.0 LTS is available upstream. Could you consider packaging
>> it?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Sure, but nodejs 6.11.x first has t
On 2017-11-05 21:27+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Sure, but nodejs 6.11.x first has to go in testing...
Maybe you could upload 8.9.0 to experimental? It can't hurt, and, who knows, it
may also fix #878674...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
2017-11-05 21:19 GMT+01:00 Félix Sipma :
> Package: nodejs
> Version: 6.11.4~dfsg-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> node version 8.9.0 LTS is available upstream. Could you consider packaging
> it?
>
> Thanks!
Sure, but nodejs 6.11.x first has to go in testing...
Jérémy
Package: nodejs
Version: 6.11.4~dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
node version 8.9.0 LTS is available upstream. Could you consider packaging it?
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'experimental')
Archit
11 matches
Mail list logo