On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 09:35:02AM +, Chris Boot wrote:
>...
> I believe I have fully documented this in debian/README.source, but
> please do let me know if something is missing from there. Perhaps the
> debian/rules can more explicitly point at the README.source in case a
> build fails in thi
On 11/11/17 23:00, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 07:50:15PM +, Christian Blum wrote:
>> Hi Adrian,
>
> Hi Christian,
>
>> I have looked a bit closer; the error only occurs if the original sources
>> get modified in some way (in my case by a patch that introduces a symbol,
>>
On 07/11/17 14:48, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:46:59PM +0100, Christian Blum wrote:
>> Package: ppp
>> Version: 2.4.7-1+4
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: patch
>> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
>> past)
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> the ru
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:46:59PM +0100, Christian Blum wrote:
> Package: ppp
> Version: 2.4.7-1+4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> the rules file contains a problem that keeps ppp from com
Package: ppp
Version: 2.4.7-1+4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
the rules file contains a problem that keeps ppp from compiling. This patch
fixes the problem.
--- debian/rules.ORIG 2017-11-07 14:43:
5 matches
Mail list logo