Bug#881782: earlyoom: FTBFS on hurd-i386: PATH_MAX undeclared

2017-11-15 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Yangfl writes: > Sorry for having no non-Linux platform. But I think maybe I should > simply mark it as linux-any. That's fair; although (k)FreeBSD and the Hurd do both have Linux-ish /proc filesystems these days, I see no /proc/[pid]/oom_score_adj on either. Thanks, and sorry for not thinking

Bug#881782: earlyoom: FTBFS on hurd-i386: PATH_MAX undeclared

2017-11-14 Thread Yangfl
Actually I'm in huge doubt that this could ever run on non-Linux since it depends on proc stuff like /proc/meminfo, /proc/[pid]/oom_score_adj and more. And do non-Linux also suffer from not triggering oom due to swap? Sorry for having no non-Linux platform. But I think maybe I should simply mark i

Bug#881782: earlyoom: FTBFS on hurd-i386: PATH_MAX undeclared

2017-11-14 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Source: earlyoom Version: 0.12-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd-i386 The build of earlyoom for hurd-i386 (admittedly not a release architecture) failed: kill.c:104:12: error: 'PATH_MAX' undeclared (f