Bug#881846: rustc: FTBFS on armel

2018-03-03 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 03/03/18 09:32, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi! > > I have managed to build rustc 1.24 natively on armel using the changes from > the following bug reports: > > - #891022 - rustc: Please include patch to disable kernel helpers on armel > - #891913 - rustc: Please add architecture

Bug#881846: rustc: FTBFS on armel

2018-03-03 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! I have managed to build rustc 1.24 natively on armel using the changes from the following bug reports: - #891022 - rustc: Please include patch to disable kernel helpers on armel - #891913 - rustc: Please add architecture matching for armel => armv5te-unknown-linux-gnu - #891961 -

Bug#881846: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881846: Bug#881846: rustc: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-16 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: >> On 11/15/2017 07:16 PM, Tixy wrote: >>> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream claims that ARMv6 is supported. But to my current knowledge, proper atomics were

Bug#881846: rustc: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-15 Thread Tixy
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:37 +, Tixy wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:21 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On 11/15/2017 07:16 PM, Tixy wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > >> As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream

Bug#881846: rustc: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-15 Thread Tixy
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:21 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 11/15/2017 07:16 PM, Tixy wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream claims that > >> ARMv6 is supported. But to my current

Bug#881846: rustc: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-15 Thread Tixy
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream claims that > ARMv6 is supported. But to my current knowledge, proper atomics were > only introduced with ARMv7. ARMv6 has 32-bit atomics (LDREX and STREX instructions),

Bug#881846: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#881846: rustc: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-15 Thread Ximin Luo
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > On 11/15/2017 07:16 PM, Tixy wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>> As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream claims that >>> ARMv6 is supported. But to my current knowledge, proper atomics were >>> only

Bug#881846: rustc: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-15 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 11/15/2017 07:16 PM, Tixy wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream claims that >> ARMv6 is supported. But to my current knowledge, proper atomics were >> only introduced with ARMv7. > > ARMv6 has

Bug#881846: rustc: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-15 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 11/15/2017 06:33 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > There are no old build logs for rustc/armel, but IIRC atomics were broken > on libstdc++/armel for a while, but that got fixed. Not sure if that's > related to this; maybe the maintainers or the armel porters can take a > look with a recent

Bug#881846: rustc: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: rustc Version: 1.21.0+dfsg1-3 Severity: important Hi, rustc is missing on armel. I asked sometime ago about its status: 17:08 < infinity0> pochu_: armel isn't supported because of lack of proper atomics in llvm, it is theoreticaly possible but noone has spent the effort There are no