Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-30 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 -patch +pending Hello Ian, On Thu, Nov 30 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Is this a proposal/seconding of the modified patch? > > Sure. Thanks for confirming that. > Thanks for keeping on top of this. > > But, I guess you already know that I think that this is excessive >

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-30 Thread Ian Jackson
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]"): > On Thu, Nov 23 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I'm not wedded to this second half of the sentence. > > Is this a proposal/seconding of the modified patch? Su

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-24 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Ian, On Thu, Nov 23 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > I'm not wedded to this second half of the sentence. Is this a proposal/seconding of the modified patch? This bug needs one more second to be applied to the Policy repo. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive

2017-11-24 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Sean Whitton dijo [Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:40:54PM -0700]: > Hello David, > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:18:37PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > >> > "cowsay-offensive". In this situation the "-offensive" package can > >> > be Suggested by the core package(s), but should not be Recommended > >>

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive

2017-11-23 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello David, On Thu, Nov 23 2017, David Kalnischkies wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:18:37PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: >> > "cowsay-offensive". In this situation the "-offensive" package can >> > be Suggested by the core package(s), but should not be Recommended >> > or Depended on,

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-23 Thread Ian Jackson
David Kalnischkies writes ("Re: Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive"): > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:18:37PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > > "cowsay-offensive". In this situation the "-offensive" package can > > >

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive

2017-11-23 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:18:37PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > "cowsay-offensive". In this situation the "-offensive" package can > > be Suggested by the core package(s), but should not be Recommended > > or Depended on, so that it is not installed by default.

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive

2017-11-23 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
Hi, On 23/11/17 00:18, Sean Whitton wrote: >> So to be concrete, how about this: >> >> N. Packages with potentially offensive content >> >> As a maintainer you should make a judgement about whether the >> contents of a package is appropriate to include, whether it needs >> any kind of

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive

2017-11-22 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Sean Whitton dijo [Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:18:37PM -0700]: > > So to be concrete, how about this: > > > > N. Packages with potentially offensive content > > > > As a maintainer you should make a judgement about whether the > > contents of a package is appropriate to include, whether it needs

Bug#882445: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive

2017-11-22 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: debian-policy Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-pol...@packages.debian.org Usertags: normative Hello Ian, Iain, Gunnar, Steve, On Wed, Nov 22 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > So to be concrete, how about this: > > N. Packages with potentially offensive content > > As a maintainer