On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 23:53 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > If you don't want a hard dependency (which I still think would be the
> > correct thing to do since "a command line argument of clang doesn't
> > actually work without it"), would you perhaps consider a Recommends: ?
> >
> Sure, I fixed
Hi!
On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 22:27 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> For now, I am not planning to add this a mandatory dep. openmp is a
> niche and I don't think
> we should have a hard dependency for every clang user.
> By the way libomp-dev is suggested by clang packages.
In theory, you are right,
On 26/11/2017 23:47, Alexander Kurtz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 22:27 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> For now, I am not planning to add this a mandatory dep. openmp is a
>> niche and I don't think
>> we should have a hard dependency for every clang user.
>> By the way libomp-dev is s
On 26/11/2017 20:07, Alexander Kurtz wrote:
> Package: clang
> Version: 1:3.8-37
>
> In contrast, the clang package does not pull in libomp-dev, which means
> the following fails:
>
> alexander@shepard:~$ cat test.c
> int main(){
> #pragma omp parallel for schedule(dynamic,50)
>
Package: clang
Version: 1:3.8-37
Hi!
The gcc package Depends: on gcc-7 -> libgcc-7-dev -> libgomp1, which
means the following works out-of-the-box:
alexander@shepard:~$ cat test.c
int main(){
#pragma omp parallel for schedule(dynamic,50)
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++);
5 matches
Mail list logo
