> Mounting volume... $MFTMirr does not match $MFT (record 28).
Please open a specific ticket, this is unrelated to
the changelog issue.
Also, please attach to the report the output of :
sudo ntfsinfo -fm /dev/sdb1
at bottom :-
On 06/12/2017, Jean-Pierre André wrote:
> > so it seems better to switch back following the AR releases, right?
>
> This is not really a decision by me, I suppose you have
> to follow some Debian guidelines.
>
> I can only add that, if no distribution is interested in
> the AR relea
> so it seems better to switch back following the AR releases, right?
This is not really a decision by me, I suppose you have
to follow some Debian guidelines.
I can only add that, if no distribution is interested in
the AR releases, the Tuxera versions will be less tested
before they are releas
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Jean-Pierre André
wrote:
>> As I understood, Jean-Pierre abandoned the AR releases
>
> Not at all. The only recent change is that Tuxera is not
> referencing the AR releases any more, but they still exist
> and they are a way to push fixes without being tied to
> Tu
> There were (is?) two kind of releases of ntfs-3g.
This is still the case.
> As I understood, Jean-Pierre abandoned the AR releases
Not at all. The only recent change is that Tuxera is not
referencing the AR releases any more, but they still exist
and they are a way to push fixes without being
Control: tags -1 +pending
Hi Shirish,
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:26 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> I was looking at the newest changelog but it shows only the 2014
> entries although upstream does publish/have a changelog at
> jp-andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/changelog.html . It would be nice if the
> ch
Package: ntfs-3g
Version: 1:2017.3.23-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I was looking at the newest changelog but it shows only the 2014
entries although upstream does publish/have a changelog at
jp-andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/changelog.html . It would be nice if the
changelog can be merged in c
7 matches
Mail list logo
