Hi Cyril,
On Thursday, 21 December 2017 11:53 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Yeah, that would look good to me, provided there's nothing added in a
> x.y.z version that would make the udeb depend on x.y (in the metadata
> section) while it actually depends on a feature introduced in a x.y.z
> (on a
Hi Hugh,
Hugh McMaster (2017-12-21):
> Assuming I understand the problem correctly, the attached patch should help.
>
> After compiling and installing, I have the following in
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/libfreetype6:amd64.shlibs:
>
> libfreetype 6 libfreetype6 (>= 2.8)
Hi Cyril,
Assuming I understand the problem correctly, the attached patch should help.
After compiling and installing, I have the following in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libfreetype6:amd64.shlibs:
libfreetype 6 libfreetype6 (>= 2.8)
udeb: libfreetype 6 libfreetype6-udeb (>= 2.8)
Hope this
Source: freetype
Version: 2.8.1-0.1
Severity: serious
(Please keep debian-b...@lists.debian.org in copy of your replies.)
Hi,
While preparing the release announcement for Buster Alpha 2, I've
stumbled upon the symbols addition in your last upload. Checking the
dependency for the udeb, it seems
4 matches
Mail list logo