[Altering Subject to match updated bug title]
Hi Guillem & David,
> I'd rather we fixed the actual problem here with elpa, instead of
> lowering it from W to I. In addition to my mass overrides, I was happy
> to see that we could slowly course-correct the Section degradation via
> lintian, but lo
tags 883772 + pending
thanks
Hi David,
> In case you consider the previous not constructive ;), what about
> lowering the severity to "pedantic"?
Again, I share your opinion about the entire section thing, just that
a bug against Lintian is the best forum for such a discussion :) Lets
downgrade
Chris Lamb writes:
> Hey David!
>
>> the programming-language sections are a mess
>
> Whilst I don't necessarily disagree, I'm not sure what the next steps
> for Lintian are here.
>
> Putting it another way, I see you linked #802488 but until that gets
> some kind of resolution (or some change to
tags 883772 + moreinfo
thanks
Hey David!
> the programming-language sections are a mess
Whilst I don't necessarily disagree, I'm not sure what the next steps
for Lintian are here.
Putting it another way, I see you linked #802488 but until that gets
some kind of resolution (or some change to Pol
4 matches
Mail list logo