intrigeri:
> Rene Engelhard:
>> done already, though in complain mode..
> Thanks! I'll follow up on the next steps on a new bug report, quoting
> the useful bits from this one :)
FTR that's #886548.
Rene Engelhard:
> done already, though in complain mode..
Thanks! I'll follow up on the next steps on a new bug report, quoting
the useful bits from this one :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 11:39:26PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > AppArmor policy. Now, runtime tests such as autopkgtests may be
> > affected; if needed I could take a look.
[...]
> Note e.g. the -Dorg.openoffice.test.arg.user. Similar (more like what
> was in the bug report in the first
tag 883800 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 06:47:38PM +0100, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
> following up on our conversation on #882597, here is a patch series
> that documents how advanced users can adjust the included AppArmor
> profiles to cope with their local setup, and
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 1:5.4.3-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
following up on our conversation on #882597, here is a patch series
that documents how advanced users can adjust the included AppArmor
profiles to cope with their local setup, and re-enables the AppArmor
profiles
5 matches
Mail list logo
