Bug#884222: valabind: Fails to build with vala 0.38

2018-02-03 Thread Sebastian Reichel
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:14:30 +0100 Rico Tzschichholz wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:52:24 -0500 Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > https://salsa.debian.org/jbicha/valabind > > > > Sebastian, could you take a look? > > > > Afaics this looks good and should be uploaded asap. > > This is the only bit whic

Bug#884222: valabind: Fails to build with vala 0.38

2018-01-30 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:52:24 -0500 Jeremy Bicha wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/jbicha/valabind > > Sebastian, could you take a look? > Afaics this looks good and should be uploaded asap. This is the only bit which blocks the vala 0.38 introduction in testing. Regards, Rico signature.asc

Bug#884222: valabind: Fails to build with vala 0.38

2018-01-22 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > This has been fixed upstream, but the new bugfix release > requires vala 0.40. Reading the discussion between upstream > valabind and vala, it looks like vala 0.38 cannot be supported. Thanks to ricotz' help, I managed to get valabind to

Bug#884222: valabind: Fails to build with vala 0.38

2018-01-12 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi, This has been fixed upstream, but the new bugfix release requires vala 0.40. Reading the discussion between upstream valabind and vala, it looks like vala 0.38 cannot be supported. -- Sebastian signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#884222: valabind: Fails to build with vala 0.38

2017-12-12 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Source: valabind Version: 0.10.0-3 Severity: serious Forwarded: https://github.com/radare/valabind/issues/43 I did a test-rebuild of vala reverse-dependencies with vala 0.38.4 from Debian experimental. https://launchpad.net/~jbicha/+archive/ubuntu/vala38/+packages?batch=185 valabind is the only