Bug#884711: stretch-pu: package dpdk/16.11.4-1+deb9u1

2018-03-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2018-02-11 at 19:26 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 09:47 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 20:14:14 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > Thank you for the review, I have reworked

Bug#884711: stretch-pu: package dpdk/16.11.4-1+deb9u1

2018-02-11 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 09:47 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 20:14:14 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > Thank you for the review, I have reworked the debdiff - rather than > > taking the last 16.11.x version we uploaded in Sid and reverting a

Bug#884711: stretch-pu: package dpdk/16.11.4-1+deb9u1

2018-02-10 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: tags -1 confirmed On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 20:14:14 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Thank you for the review, I have reworked the debdiff - rather than > taking the last 16.11.x version we uploaded in Sid and reverting a few > changes, instead I've taken the version in Stretch and merged

Bug#884711: stretch-pu: package dpdk/16.11.4-1+deb9u1

2018-01-13 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Luca, On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 14:46:04 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > DPDK maintains LTS branches upstream for 2 years [1]. This is covered > by regressions tests from Intel and AT on various networking hardware > and virtualized environments.These tests are run to