Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2018-01-07 Thread Hugh McMaster
mas...@outlook.com> Sent: Friday, 22 December 2017 11:30:57 PM To: Gianfranco Costamagna Cc: Adam Borowski; 884...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU] Hi Gianfranco, On Friday, 22 December 2017 3:11 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > ok, so fix all the reverse dep

Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2017-12-26 Thread Hugh McMaster
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am once again looking for a sponsor for an NMU of the package "freetype". This version addresses concerns raised by Adam Borowski and Gianfranco Costamagna, and removes the arch-dependent libdir output instead of freetype-config

Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2017-12-22 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Gianfranco, On Friday, 22 December 2017 3:11 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > ok, so fix all the reverse dependencies *before* dropping it, not after. > We don't usually "break stuff and let maintainers fixup things", but: > 1) open bugs (maybe with patches) Okay, I'll start filing bugs to

Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2017-12-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello Hugh, >33 reverse build dependences FTBFS after the removal of freetype-config.>11 >don't care, and 42 already use pkg-config to detect freetype2. ok, so fix all the reverse dependencies *before* dropping it, not after. We don't usually "break stuff and let maintainers fixup things",

Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2017-12-20 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 4:44 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=freetype-config > this is a big no-go, first, please ask Steve to review, but I would assume > this patch > is wrong, because a lot of packages are right now calling freetype-config in

Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2017-12-20 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 2:47 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > Hmm, there are two RC bugs on the package, but you're not fixing either of > them.  Instead, you fix wishlist wontfix bugs. One of the RC bugs is tagged 'wontfix' -- and that is also upstream's response. I've had a look at the second

Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2017-12-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 moreinfo > > - Exclude freetype-config, freetype-config.1 and freetype2.m4 > > from installation in libfreetype6-dev. > > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=freetype-config this is a big no-go, first, please ask Steve to review, but I would assume this patch is

Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2017-12-19 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:04:38PM +, Hugh McMaster wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU of the package "freetype". > > * Package name: freetype > Version: 2.8.1-0.2 > > The source builds the following binary packages: > * freetype2-demos - FreeType 2 demonstration programs > *

Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]

2017-12-19 Thread Hugh McMaster
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU of the package "freetype". * Package name: freetype Version: 2.8.1-0.2 Upstream Author: Werner Lemberg/Freetype Team, freetype-de...@nongnu.org * URL: https://www.freetype.org * License: FTL