Bug#884865: Response?

2018-03-07 Thread Brett Johnson
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > > > John Kessenich (main maintainer of glslang) is working on coming up with > > a reasonable versioning scheme for it. So until he does that, you may > > want to use a scheme similar to what I did, that will be

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-03-07 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 02.03.2018 18:54, Brett Johnson wrote: > Oh!  I didn't know you were actively working on packaging these.  I've > also packaged them, with results in the debian-unstable branches of > these github repositories: > > https://github.com/linuxturtle/glslang >

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-03-02 Thread Brett Johnson
Oh, also, my thoughts on splitting spirv-tools were that it didn't need splitting, as the whole package is a "-dev" package in itself. I.e. even though it produces libraries, executables, and headers, they're all part of the same package, they're all only used for development, and don't really

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-03-02 Thread Brett Johnson
Oh! I didn't know you were actively working on packaging these. I've also packaged them, with results in the debian-unstable branches of these github repositories: https://github.com/linuxturtle/glslang https://github.com/linuxturtle/SPIRV-Tools https://github.com/linuxturtle/SPIRV-Headers I

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-03-02 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 26.02.2018 21:50, Brett Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >> just wondering (again) if glslang should be >> packaged separately or not. Because now would be the time to do it. > > FWIW, after digging further down this rabbit hole, I

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-02-26 Thread Brett Johnson
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > just wondering (again) if glslang should be > packaged separately or not. Because now would be the time to do it. FWIW, after digging further down this rabbit hole, I think you made the right call by not wanting to

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-02-26 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Brett Johnson kirjoitti 26.02.2018 klo 20:52: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >> Looks like latest vulkan changed how it depends on SPIRV, so we'll just >> bite the bullet and package glslang and spirv-tools separately instead.. > > I've got a first

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-02-26 Thread Brett Johnson
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Looks like latest vulkan changed how it depends on SPIRV, so we'll just > bite the bullet and package glslang and spirv-tools separately instead.. I've got a first draft of these packages done. Also, I think I should

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-02-15 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Brett Johnson kirjoitti 15.02.2018 klo 23:32: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Brett Johnson wrote: >> Would you like me to file ITPs for them? Or are you planning on doing >> so right away? > > Since we're on opposite sides of the pond, and I'm very impatient :D, > I went

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-02-15 Thread Brett Johnson
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Brett Johnson wrote: > Would you like me to file ITPs for them? Or are you planning on doing > so right away? Since we're on opposite sides of the pond, and I'm very impatient :D, I went ahead and filed ITPs for glslang (#890552) and

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-02-15 Thread Brett Johnson
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Looks like latest vulkan changed how it depends on SPIRV, so we'll just > bite the bullet and package glslang and spirv-tools separately instead.. Yes, past the 1.0.65 tag/branch, the loader/layers repository (as well

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-02-15 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 12.02.2018 20:43, Brett Johnson wrote: > Excellent, thank you for the update! > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:55 AM, Timo Aaltonen > wrote: > > Brett Johnson kirjoitti 09.02.2018 klo 18:50: > > Any chance of a response to this request? 

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-02-12 Thread Brett Johnson
Excellent, thank you for the update! On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:55 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Brett Johnson kirjoitti 09.02.2018 klo 18:50: > > Any chance of a response to this request? If y'all think it's a bad > > idea, or don't want to do it, that's OK, I'll go back to

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-02-10 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Brett Johnson kirjoitti 09.02.2018 klo 18:50: > Any chance of a response to this request?  If y'all think it's a bad > idea, or don't want to do it, that's OK, I'll go back to the drawing > board and try to figure out some sane way to package/version glslang and > spirv-tools independently

Bug#884865: Response?

2018-02-09 Thread Brett Johnson
Any chance of a response to this request? If y'all think it's a bad idea, or don't want to do it, that's OK, I'll go back to the drawing board and try to figure out some sane way to package/version glslang and spirv-tools independently (although that's going to be difficult, as they don't have