Re: Moritz Muehlenhoff 2020-03-27 <20200327220044.s7cmyqmlnevty...@inutil.org>
> > There's a py3 branch in upstream Hg that's activish. I haven't tried
> > it yet, but it looks promising. I'll give it a try over the weekend
> > and report back here.
I've pushed the new branch to our git, but it's
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:59:35PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Moritz Mühlenhoff 2020-03-27
> <20200327215634.GA1565432@pisco.westfalen.local>
> > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 07:16:47PM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > > There has been some discussion about #936299 on the upstream mailing
> > >
Re: Moritz Mühlenhoff 2020-03-27
<20200327215634.GA1565432@pisco.westfalen.local>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 07:16:47PM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > There has been some discussion about #936299 on the upstream mailing list,
> > and
> > there have been a few upstream commits starting to port the
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 07:16:47PM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> There has been some discussion about #936299 on the upstream mailing list, and
> there have been a few upstream commits starting to port the code to Python3.
>
>
Please CC me on replies to the bug since it's not particularly easy
for me to subscribe to all of these emails.
Personally, I think porting away from pygtk (to GTK3 and GObject
Introspection) is more urgent than porting to python3, but yes you'll
ultimately need to do both.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
There has been some discussion about #936299 on the upstream mailing list, and
there have been a few upstream commits starting to port the code to Python3.
http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/2019-August/005580.html
-- Chris, KB2IQN
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
6 matches
Mail list logo
