On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 13:01, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:22:41AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > Le 02/04/2020 à 22:23, Thomas Leonard a écrit :
> > > My package (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zeroinstall-injector)
> > > depends on lablgtk2 and the tracker says
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:22:41AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 02/04/2020 à 22:23, Thomas Leonard a écrit :
> > My package (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zeroinstall-injector)
> > depends on lablgtk2 and the tracker says it will be removed on 4th Apr
> > due to this issue.
that is,
Le 02/04/2020 à 22:23, Thomas Leonard a écrit :
> My package (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zeroinstall-injector)
> depends on lablgtk2 and the tracker says it will be removed on 4th Apr
> due to this issue.
>
> I can't upgrade to lablgtk3 because Debian/unstable only has an old
> beta release of
Hi,
My package (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zeroinstall-injector)
depends on lablgtk2 and the tracker says it will be removed on 4th Apr
due to this issue.
I can't upgrade to lablgtk3 because Debian/unstable only has an old
beta release of that (3.0~beta6-2), which is missing some functions.
Control: tag -1 - pending
Control: severity -1 important
Le 14/12/2018 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
> gtksourceview2 will be included in Debian 10 "Buster" but we will try
> to remove it early in the Bullseye series. [1]
>
> Therefore, I suggest bringing that package back, then you can lower
>
Control: reopen -1
You can't drop liblablgtksourceview2-ocaml-dev as long as stuff still
depends and build-depends on it.
coq
lablgtk-extra
laby
marionnet
gtksourceview2 will be included in Debian 10 "Buster" but we will try
to remove it early in the Bullseye series. [1]
Therefore, I suggest br
6 matches
Mail list logo