On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 20:07:04 -0500 James McCoy wrote:
[...]
> There is no upstream to forward the request to.
> Someone has to volunteer to do the work to support the amsmath package
> and that person would then be the upstream.
>
> Charles isn't upstream because he's explicitly restricted the
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:33:30PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:12:01 -0500 James McCoy wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 07:33:40PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > So I am puzzled: upstream dropped support for extended syntax provided
> > > by LaTeX
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:12:01 -0500 James McCoy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 07:33:40PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > So I am puzzled: upstream dropped support for extended syntax provided
> > by LaTeX packages (such as, for instance, amsmath), but, at the same
> > time, suggest users
Control: reopen -1
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 13:22:28 -0500 James McCoy wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:31:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 21:34:19 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > Hello again!
> > >
> > > I
On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 21:34:19 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> Hello again!
>
> I noticed another regression, this time in tex syntax highlighting.
[...]
Hello again,
is there any progress on this regression?
Have you tried to reproduce it?
Have you investigated it?
Have you
Package: vim-runtime
Version: 2:8.0.1401-2
Severity: normal
Hello again!
I noticed another regression, this time in tex syntax highlighting.
The issue seems to be that it fails to enter math mode within the align
environment (and probably other amsmath environments).
The package version
6 matches
Mail list logo
