Bug#886799: openafs-modules-dkms: install fails with compile error "implicit declaration of function 'inode_change_ok'"

2018-01-25 Thread A. Lewenberg
series file (patch file: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=886799;filename=meta_port_inode_change_ok.patch;msg=15) 4. Build the package using "pbuild wheezy". 5. Copy the created debian package openafs-modules-dkms_1.6.9-2+deb8u4~bpo70+1_all.deb to a wheezy serv

Bug#886799: openafs-modules-dkms: install fails with compile error "implicit declaration of function 'inode_change_ok'"

2018-01-25 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 09:21:48AM -0800, deb...@lewenberg.com wrote: > > The patch you provide works fine with jessie and the 1.6.9 source > packages. However, I cannot get it to work with wheezy. > > I compile the openafs source package against wheezy and the compilation > completes without e

Bug#886799: openafs-modules-dkms: install fails with compile error "implicit declaration of function 'inode_change_ok'"

2018-01-25 Thread deb251
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:52:24 +0100 Zdenek Salvet wrote: On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:08:18PM -0600, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > So the security update for meltdown/spectre changed the kernel ABI? > That's kind of unfortunate; usually Ben tries pretty hard to avoid > doing so. Yes, it was probably nec

Bug#886799: fixing openafs kernel module for security updated kernel

2018-01-20 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
The SRU request for jessie is in #887857. I don't think there is a way to get a fix into jessie-backports, so I think we will need to remove openafs-modules-source and openafs-modules-dkms from jessie-backports and pull the version from buster into jessie-backports-sloppy (which will be a trip thr

Bug#886799: Info received (openafs-modules-dkms: info regarding source of bug)

2018-01-12 Thread deb251
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:55:52 -0500 Richard Burhans wrote: The attached patch appears to fix openafs_1.6.9-2+deb8u6: While that patch takes care of the inode_change_ok problem, there is still the "'struct dentry' has no member named 'd_alias'" problem (see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

Bug#886799: fixing openafs kernel module for security updated kernel

2018-01-11 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi folks, Thanks for all the interest and proposed patches. I just want to note that the openafs fix will need to go through as a SRU (Stable Release Update), which requires preapproval from the stable release managers, and will not actually appear in stable/oldstable until the next point release.

Bug#886799: Info received (openafs-modules-dkms: info regarding source of bug)

2018-01-11 Thread Richard Burhans
The attached patch appears to fix openafs_1.6.9-2+deb8u6: 0023-setattr_prepare.patch Description: Binary data

Bug#886799: openafs-modules-dkms: info regarding source of bug

2018-01-11 Thread Richard C. Burhans
Package: openafs-modules-dkms Version: 1.6.9-2+deb8u6 Followup-For: Bug #886799 Dear Maintainer, This is the kernel change that causes this issue (inode_change_ok replaced by setattr_prepare): https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/31051c85b5e2aaaf6315f74c72a732673632a905 It was

Bug#886799:

2018-01-10 Thread Jonathan Lent
I want to confirm that we’re seeing this on multiple Jessie systems as well, when building for 3.16.0-5-amd64: Building initial module for 3.16.0-5-amd64 Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.16.0-5-amd64 (x86_64) Consult /var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.6.9/build/make.log for more infor

Bug#886799: openafs-modules-dkms: install fails with compile error "implicit declaration of function 'inode_change_ok'"

2018-01-10 Thread Jonathan Lent
I want to confirm that we’re seeing this on multiple Jessie systems as well, when building for 3.16.0-5-amd64: Building initial module for 3.16.0-5-amd64 Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.16.0-5-amd64 (x86_64) Consult /var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.6.9/build/make.log for more infor

Bug#886799: openafs-modules-dkms: install fails with compile error "implicit declaration of function 'inode_change_ok'"

2018-01-10 Thread Zdenek Salvet
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:08:18PM -0600, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > So the security update for meltdown/spectre changed the kernel ABI? > That's kind of unfortunate; usually Ben tries pretty hard to avoid > doing so. Yes, it was probably necessary (other postponed fixes requiring new ABI were added

Bug#886799: openafs-modules-dkms: install fails with compile error "implicit declaration of function 'inode_change_ok'"

2018-01-09 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 02:40:23PM -0800, Adam Lewenberg wrote: > Package: openafs-modules-dkms > Version: 1.6.9-2+deb8u4~bpo70+1 > Severity: important > > After upgrading wheezy kernel to 3.2.0-5-amd64 openafs-modules-dkms could not > rebuild > OpenAFS kernel module. > > Here is the error mess

Bug#886799: openafs-modules-dkms: install fails with compile error "implicit declaration of function 'inode_change_ok'"

2018-01-09 Thread Adam Lewenberg
Package: openafs-modules-dkms Version: 1.6.9-2+deb8u4~bpo70+1 Severity: important After upgrading wheezy kernel to 3.2.0-5-amd64 openafs-modules-dkms could not rebuild OpenAFS kernel module. Here is the error message: CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.6.9/build/src/libafs/MODLOAD-3.2.0-5-amd64