Control: block -1 by 915948
Hi,
On 18-01-2022 21:59, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On 2020-12-20, Paul Gevers wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 20:49:43 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
I think I have found the cause for this issue. Apparently some arch:all
binary packages are not listed in both the binary-/Pac
On 2020-12-20, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 20:49:43 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I think I have found the cause for this issue. Apparently some arch:all
>> binary packages are not listed in both the binary-/Packages.* and
>> binary-all/Packages.* file groups, but ONLY in the binary-all
Hi all,
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 20:49:43 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> I think I have found the cause for this issue. Apparently some arch:all
> binary packages are not listed in both the binary-/Packages.* and
> binary-all/Packages.* file groups, but ONLY in the binary-all/Packages.*
> files (at least
Dear all,
I think I have found the cause for this issue. Apparently some arch:all
binary packages are not listed in both the binary-/Packages.* and
binary-all/Packages.* file groups, but ONLY in the binary-all/Packages.*
files (at least on unstable). The britney log tells me that the
binary-all fi
(from IRC)
I just saw (unfortunately the data will be gone now):
old binaries left on all: python-doc (from 2.7.15~rc1-1) (but ignoring
cruft, so nevermind)
Maybe a hint, this happened in the package python-defaults.
I don't think it shouldn't say "cruft".
Paul
signature.asc
Description: Ope
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Hi,
Package src:octave-interval creates two binaries:
- octave-interval (arch:any)
- octave-interval-doc (arch:all)
Version 3.1.0-3 was uploaded on 2018-01-07 as source-only:
https://tra
6 matches
Mail list logo
