Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2021-02-26 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 03 Sep 2020 at 11:46:56 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Simon McVittie (2020-09-03): > > One way to resolve [needing a libstdc++ udeb] > > might be to build the vte2.91 udeb with > > -static-libstdc++, which makes it about 200K larger than it would > > otherwise have been, but avoids

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2020-09-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Simon, Simon McVittie (2020-09-03): > On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 21:27:47 +0100, Egmont Koblinger wrote: > > > We don't do c++ in d-i. > > > > Unfortunately this sounds really problematic. As of version 0.42 vte > > has been using (more and more) C++. This is not like Ubuntu's PCRE2 > > hack

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2020-09-03 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 21:27:47 +0100, Egmont Koblinger wrote: > > We don't do c++ in d-i. > > Unfortunately this sounds really problematic. As of version 0.42 vte > has been using (more and more) C++. This is not like Ubuntu's PCRE2 > hack which is a matter of a few hours of work reverting and

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2018-01-21 Thread Egmont Koblinger
Hi guys, > We don't do c++ in d-i. Unfortunately this sounds really problematic. As of version 0.42 vte has been using (more and more) C++. This is not like Ubuntu's PCRE2 hack which is a matter of a few hours of work reverting and merging a few commits. It's reasonably impossible to revert to

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2018-01-18 Thread Michael Biebl
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 02:24:35 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Getting back to src:vte2.91 though, that's not sufficient, as the > resulting udeb depends (right now or after a rebuild against a patched > pcre2) on libstdc++6. We don't do c++ in d-i. That's going to be hard:

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2018-01-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 19.01.2018 um 03:02 schrieb Michael Biebl: > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:11:36 -0500 Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> Control: block -1 by 887674 >> >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:51 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >>> - vte2.91 needs to build an installable udeb; I think I've

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2018-01-18 Thread Michael Biebl
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:11:36 -0500 Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Control: block -1 by 887674 > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:51 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > - vte2.91 needs to build an installable udeb; I think I've reported a > >few issues already, but I don't

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2018-01-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: severity 887674 important Control: tag 887674 patch Control: tag 887649 - patch Cyril Brulebois (2018-01-19): > Control: severity -1 887674 > Control: tag -1 patch Wow, that was incredibly stupid, sorry. (Blaming this on headache.) > No need to have a serious bug

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2018-01-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: severity -1 887674 Control: tag -1 patch Hi, Jeremy Bicha (2018-01-18): > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:51 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > - vte2.91 needs to build an installable udeb; I think I've reported a > >few issues already, but I don't tend

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2018-01-18 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Control: block -1 by 887674 On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:51 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > - vte2.91 needs to build an installable udeb; I think I've reported a >few issues already, but I don't tend to do so in a timely fashion >since it's not used yet. Right now,

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2018-01-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Jeremy Bicha (2018-01-18): > Package: cdebconf-gtk-terminal > Version: 0.31 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid buster > User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: oldlibs vte > > cdebconf-gtk-terminal Depends and Build-Depends on vte. In fact, it's > now

Bug#887649: cdebconf-gtk-terminal: Please don't depend on unmaintained vte

2018-01-18 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Package: cdebconf-gtk-terminal Version: 0.31 Severity: serious Tags: sid buster User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: oldlibs vte cdebconf-gtk-terminal Depends and Build-Depends on vte. In fact, it's now the only package keeping vte in Debian Testing. The Debian GNOME team