Hi,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 09:06:56PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > So I would also suggest to bump version to 1:1.0.51-12. Not for launchpad,
> > but for end users.
>
> Christian, may I do an NMU now to bump the
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> So I would also suggest to bump version to 1:1.0.51-12. Not for launchpad,
> but for end users.
Christian, may I do an NMU now to bump the Debian revision number?
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 08:07:52PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> If I can not use an epoch to start version numbers from scratch, then
> the whole implementation of epochs is broken.
Epochs were mainly intended for handling the case where upstream changed
their version numbering sequence
Hello,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> If I can not use an epoch to start version
> numbers from scratch, then the whole implementation of epochs is broken.
> I doubt that I am the first to fall into this trap.
epochs are meant to go backwards when upstream changes their
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:39:24PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Christian T. Steigies
> wrote:
> > The bug report you mention has had no activity since more than a year, so I
> > guess this is not seen as a problem. If it were a problem, the
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> The bug report you mention has had no activity since more than a year, so I
> guess this is not seen as a problem. If it were a problem, the upload
> should have been rejected and not progressed into testing.
If we
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:44:50AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Christian T. Steigies
> wrote:
> > Since the package migrated to Debian/testing, I consider this to be a bug in
> > Ubuntu Launchpad, not Debian. Please forward it to Ubuntu as I
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Since the package migrated to Debian/testing, I consider this to be a bug in
> Ubuntu Launchpad, not Debian. Please forward it to Ubuntu as I can not fix
> bugs in Ubuntu.
The only thing that is needed now is to
Moin,
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:55:35AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Christian T. Steigies
> wrote:
> > The package has migrated to testing, what else needs to be synced in Debian?
> > What is Launchpad?
>
> Oops, I meant to write "can't be
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> The package has migrated to testing, what else needs to be synced in Debian?
> What is Launchpad?
Oops, I meant to write "can't be synced to Ubuntu". Launchpad is the
service Ubuntu uses for bug tracking and many
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:07:26AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Source: moon-buggy
> Version: 1:1.0.51-1
>
> moon-buggy can't be automatically synced to Debian because Launchpad
> gives this error:
>
> moon-buggy 1:1.0.51-1 in buster (moon-buggy_1.0.51-1.dsc already
> exists in destination
Source: moon-buggy
Version: 1:1.0.51-1
moon-buggy can't be automatically synced to Debian because Launchpad
gives this error:
moon-buggy 1:1.0.51-1 in buster (moon-buggy_1.0.51-1.dsc already
exists in destination archive with different contents.)
I believe all you need to do to fix this is to
12 matches
Mail list logo