Paul Gevers:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>> The wording could be better. I would suggest
>>
>> Starting with glibc 2.26,
>> Linux
>> kernel 3.2 or later is required. The preinst for > role="package">libc6 performs a check, and if this
>> fails
>> then to avoid
Hi Justin,
On 18-02-2019 21:43, Justin B Rye wrote:
> The wording could be better. I would suggest
>
> Starting with glibc 2.26,
> Linux
> kernel 3.2 or later is required. The preinst for role="package">libc6 performs a check, and if this fails
> then to
Paul Gevers wrote:
> I have started to go through reports against the release-notes, to be
> ready when we release.
That's good. I've done my own initial trial-run upgrade and found
absolutely nothing to report.
> diff --git a/en/issues.dbk b/en/issues.dbk
> index 20122d3e..706266bf 100644
>
Dear debian-l10n-english,
I have started to go through reports against the release-notes, to be
ready when we release.
On 18-02-2019 13:17, Baptiste Jammet wrote:
> Dixit Paul Gevers, le 16/02/2019 :
>> I have prepared the attached patch that I intend to commit if nobody
>> objects to the
Hi,
Dixit Paul Gevers, le 16/02/2019 :
>I have prepared the attached patch that I intend to commit if nobody
>objects to the wording in a couple of days. It adds this description to
>the issues list.
Don't hesitate to Cc debian-l10n-english if you need reviews.
>PS: is it somehow possible to
Control: tags -1 patch pending
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:28:00 +0100 Aurelien Jarno
wrote:
> Starting with glibc 2.26, Linux kernel 3.2 or later is required. This
> change only affects amd64 and i386 as it was already the case in Stretch
> for other architectures. The libc6 preinst has a check and
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Tags: buster sid
Starting with glibc 2.26, Linux kernel 3.2 or later is required. This
change only affects amd64 and i386 as it was already the case in Stretch
for other architectures. The libc6 preinst has a check and aborts the
installation if it is not
7 matches
Mail list logo
