Bug#888656: flowcanvas: should this package be removed? (superseded by ganv)

2020-08-30 Thread Jann Haber
Hi all, recently, src:ladish has been removed from testing for other reasons. If there are no other rdeps by now, how about we continue here and remove flowcanvas (at least from testing)? Cheers, Jann On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:29:08 +0100 Alessio Treglia wrote: > Hi all, > > On Mon, Sep 10,

Bug#888656: flowcanvas: should this package be removed? (superseded by ganv)

2018-09-10 Thread Alessio Treglia
Hi all, On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Paul Brossier wrote: > hi again, > > thanks for answering Felipe. > > Alessio, if cadence was in the archive, would removing the UI from > ladish seem like a good solution? I agree, it would most definitely be the right solution. Thanks. -- Alessio

Bug#888656: flowcanvas: should this package be removed? (superseded by ganv)

2018-09-10 Thread Paul Brossier
hi again, thanks for answering Felipe. Alessio, if cadence was in the archive, would removing the UI from ladish seem like a good solution? cheers, piem On 09/10/2018 11:33 PM, Filipe Coelho wrote: > hey all. > > ladish is pretty much dead. > that said, you could build the project with just

Bug#888656: flowcanvas: should this package be removed? (superseded by ganv)

2018-09-10 Thread Filipe Coelho
hey all. ladish is pretty much dead. that said, you could build the project with just the backend/CLI, and leave the gtk ui behind. this satisfies cadence (claudia) needs, since it actually implements a full new frontend for ladish. if that is not an option, just remove ladish altogether and

Bug#888656: flowcanvas: should this package be removed? (superseded by ganv)

2018-09-10 Thread Paul Brossier
hi all, flowcanvas should definitely removed, and ganv adopted, since it is being used in newer tools such as Cadence (see https://github.com/falkTX/Cadence) ideally, ladish should be switched from using flowcanvas to using ganv. I started looking at that, but there is quite a few API changes

Bug#888656: flowcanvas: should this package be removed? (superseded by ganv)

2018-01-28 Thread trebmuh
Le 2018-01-28 14:38, Simon McVittie a écrit : Source: flowcanvas Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 ladish Control: retitle -2 ladish: should this package be removed? flowcanvas depends on numerous obsolete

Bug#888656: flowcanvas: should this package be removed? (superseded by ganv)

2018-01-28 Thread Simon McVittie
Source: flowcanvas Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 ladish Control: retitle -2 ladish: should this package be removed? flowcanvas depends on numerous obsolete GNOME 2-era libraries (e.g. #885095) and hasn't