On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 05:17:01PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> The bug was about CVE-2017-3137, it's never a good idea to mix up
> things ;-).
This is true. However, it appears that Ondrej Zary's comment to #860225
on 2017-09-02 is in fact related to CVE-2017-3139. Since one of the
Control: retitle -1 bind9: assertion failure in validator.c:1858
Hi
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 11:12:30AM +0100, Vladislav Kurz wrote:
> This is a followup to archived bug #860225.
>
> Although
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-3139 states that
> debian is not affected by
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 02:37:14PM +0100, Vladislav Kurz wrote:
> Hello LTS team,
>
> please have a look at
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889285
>
> I think it is the same bug as CVE-2017-3139 which was considered to affect
> only RedHat, but it seems to affect debian
Control: tags -1 +wheezy
You should probably contact the Debian LTS team as it affects wheezy that’s
maintained by LTS Team.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
> On 3 Feb 2018, at 11:12, Vladislav Kurz wrote:
>
> Package: bind9
> Version:
Package: bind9
Version: 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u19
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
This is a followup to archived bug #860225.
Although
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-3139 states that
debian is not affected by
5 matches
Mail list logo