Bug#890950: Bug#902416: Bug#890950: RE: Bug#902416: systemd: systemctl hibernate: unable to resume after upgrade

On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 00:20 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Ben > > Am 10.03.19 um 23:17 schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > I think it would make sense for systemd to only set the hibernation > > device if it's not already set (i.e. if /sys/power/resume contains > > "0:0\n"). > > I get $ cat

Bug#890950: Bug#902416: Bug#890950: RE: Bug#902416: systemd: systemctl hibernate: unable to resume after upgrade

Hi Ben Am 10.03.19 um 23:17 schrieb Ben Hutchings: > I think it would make sense for systemd to only set the hibernation > device if it's not already set (i.e. if /sys/power/resume contains > "0:0\n"). I get $ cat /sys/power/resume 8:4 which part is responsible for setting that? -- Why is it