Bug#894995: rdma-core: Please add support for new architecture "riscv64" (RISC-V 64 bits little-endian)

2018-04-05 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Source: rdma-core Version: 17.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Usertags: riscv64 Hello, The current version of this package doesn't build for the riscv64 port. First it fails to be considered to build (due to missing valgrind) and, when fixing that problem, FB

Bug#894995: rdma-core: Please add support for new architecture "riscv64" (RISC-V 64 bits little-endian)

2018-04-19 Thread Benjamin Drung
Hi, Thanks for reporting this bug. Am Freitag, den 06.04.2018, 02:24 +0200 schrieb Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo: > Source: rdma-core > Version: 17.1-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: riscv64 > > Hello, > > The current version of this package d

Bug#894995: rdma-core: Please add support for new architecture "riscv64" (RISC-V 64 bits little-endian)

2018-04-19 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2018-04-19 14:00 GMT+02:00 Benjamin Drung : > > RISC-V has a FENCE instruction and the A extension (which is part of > the G instruction set) provides atomic memory operations. So the > architecture should provide coherent DMA support. To enable support, > util/udma_barrier.h needs to be adjusted.

Bug#894995: rdma-core: Please add support for new architecture "riscv64" (RISC-V 64 bits little-endian)

2018-04-20 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > I applied the same fix as for many other arches, which is to add the > > arch to the > > list of NO_COHERENT_DMA_ARCHS in debian/rules. > > > > I am not sure if support could be added at a later date, but for the > > time being, >