Hello,
On Thu, Apr 19 2018, Sean Whitton wrote:
> In the next month or so we (Ian Jackson and I) will be releasing a
> workflow called dgit-maint-debrebase(7) which
>
> - is patches-applied; but
> - automatically generates a perfect 3.0 (quilt) representation of the
> Debian changes.
>
> I.e. i
> > I am okay to wait for your next invention. Last one I remember --
> > separate patches instead of single squashed patch in
> > dgit-maint-merge(7) was awesome.
>
> Sorry but I don't understand this last sentence. Perhaps you could
> rephrase.
I mean, that I see improvements in dgit, and, wh
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 20 2018, kact...@gnu.org wrote:
> [2018-04-19 10:14] Sean Whitton
>> Hello both,
>>
>> If Dmitry wants to continue to use dgit-maint-merge(7), using 3.0
>> (quilt) will not help. It will not introduce any additional
>> metadata. The only change will be the addition of a patc
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 20 2018, kact...@gnu.org wrote:
> [2018-04-19 10:14] Sean Whitton
>> Hello both,
>>
>> If Dmitry wants to continue to use dgit-maint-merge(7), using 3.0
>> (quilt) will not help. It will not introduce any additional
>> metadata. The only change will be the addition of a patc
[2018-04-19 10:14] Sean Whitton
> Hello both,
>
> If Dmitry wants to continue to use dgit-maint-merge(7), using 3.0
> (quilt) will not help. It will not introduce any additional metadata.
> The only change will be the addition of a patch header pointing to
> dgit-repos.
What do you mean by 'ad
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Since we have submitted two sessions to DebConf18 about this new
> workflow, you can be confident the release will come before August :) So
> what I would like to suggest is that both of you hang tight for now and
> then evaluate this new wor
Hello both,
If Dmitry wants to continue to use dgit-maint-merge(7), using 3.0
(quilt) will not help. It will not introduce any additional metadata.
The only change will be the addition of a patch header pointing to
dgit-repos.
Switching to dgit-maint-gbp(7) means using a patches-unapplied workfl
Sean,
Are you able to help out here?
I admittedly haven't really used dgit so I wouldn't really know if I
were doing things right.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:01 AM, wrote:
>
> control: tags -1 help
>
> [2018-04-18 14:11] Jeremy Bicha
>> Source: inotify-tools
>> Version:
control: tags -1 help
[2018-04-18 14:11] Jeremy Bicha
> Source: inotify-tools
> Version: 3.14-5
>
> Please consider using the dgit-maint-gbp workflow instead of the
> dgit-maint-merge workflow.
>
> The recent switch from 3.0 (quilt) eliminates useful context and
> metadata from the Debian pack
Source: inotify-tools
Version: 3.14-5
Please consider using the dgit-maint-gbp workflow instead of the
dgit-maint-merge workflow.
The recent switch from 3.0 (quilt) eliminates useful context and
metadata from the Debian package itself. That metadata is now only
available in the git repo.
Direct
10 matches
Mail list logo
