Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

2018-04-23 Thread Elías Alejandro
Thanks! :D Best regards, Elías Alejandro On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Monday, April 23 2018, Elías Alejandro wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior >> wrote: >>> Something else worth mentioning is the possibility to move the pa

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

2018-04-23 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Monday, April 23 2018, Elías Alejandro wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior > wrote: >> Something else worth mentioning is the possibility to move the package >> repository from your personal namespace to the Debian namespace. Please >> let me know if you have inte

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

2018-04-23 Thread Elías Alejandro
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Something else worth mentioning is the possibility to move the package > repository from your personal namespace to the Debian namespace. Please > let me know if you have interest and I can set a repository there for > you. That cou

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

2018-04-22 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Sunday, April 22 2018, Elías Alejandro wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior > wrote: >> On Sunday, April 22 2018, I wrote: >> >>> On d/control, I see you explicitly listed the dependencies ("Depends:" >>> field). Some of them are OK to be there, but you actually nee

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

2018-04-22 Thread Elías Alejandro
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Sunday, April 22 2018, I wrote: > >> On d/control, I see you explicitly listed the dependencies ("Depends:" >> field). Some of them are OK to be there, but you actually need to >> explicitly list these: > > Sorry, I meant "you act

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

2018-04-22 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Sunday, April 22 2018, I wrote: > On d/control, I see you explicitly listed the dependencies ("Depends:" > field). Some of them are OK to be there, but you actually need to > explicitly list these: Sorry, I meant "you actually *don't* need to explicitly list these:". > Depends: >... >

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

2018-04-22 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Sunday, April 22 2018, Elías Alejandro wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "goodvibes" > > * Package name: goodvibes >Version : 0.3.6-1 >Upstream Author : Arnaud Rebillout > * URL : http://goodvibes.readthedocs.

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

2018-04-22 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Control: owner -1 ! On Sunday, April 22 2018, Elías Alejandro wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "goodvibes" > > * Package name: goodvibes >Version : 0.3.6-1 >Upstream Author : Arnaud Rebillout > * URL : http://g

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

2018-04-22 Thread Elías Alejandro
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "goodvibes" * Package name: goodvibes Version : 0.3.6-1 Upstream Author : Arnaud Rebillout * URL : http://goodvibes.readthedocs.io/ * Licen