On 17/05/18 09:48, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> I have no issue with this decision.
> Same here. But it's strange: given my workflow, I think that the build
> was retried on a idle server after the initial failure.
Not sure what happened, but you can see there is some timing info in
some tests, and
On 17/05/18 at 10:17 +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> Le 17 mai 2018 10:14:41 GMT+02:00, "Martín Ferrari" a
> écrit :
> >severity 897536 important
> >thanks
> >
> >On Mon, 14 May 2018 00:30:36 +0200 Pierre-Elliott
> >=?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9cue?= wrote:
> >
>
severity 897536 important
thanks
On Mon, 14 May 2018 00:30:36 +0200 Pierre-Elliott
=?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9cue?= wrote:
> Indeed the rake issue is gone with the latest upload of rake.
>
> Yet, [1] shows that mustache.js still FTBFS.
> [1]
>
Le 17 mai 2018 10:14:41 GMT+02:00, "Martín Ferrari" a écrit
:
>severity 897536 important
>thanks
>
>On Mon, 14 May 2018 00:30:36 +0200 Pierre-Elliott
>=?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9cue?= wrote:
>
>> Indeed the rake issue is gone with the latest upload of rake.
>>
>>
Le vendredi 11 mai 2018 à 12:12:44+0200, Jonas Meurer a écrit :
> Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
>
> Hello,
>
> I just tried to reproduce the FTBFS and failed. rake is defined as
> build-dependency and correctly pulled in according to linked the build logs.
>
> My best guess is that rake 12.3.1-2
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
>
> Hello,
>
> I just tried to reproduce the FTBFS and failed. rake is defined as
> build-dependency and correctly pulled in according to linked the build logs.
>
> My best guess is that rake
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hello,
I just tried to reproduce the FTBFS and failed. rake is defined as
build-dependency and correctly pulled in according to linked the build logs.
My best guess is that rake 12.3.1-2 had some bug that got fixed in 12.3.1-3.
Lucas, could you trigger another rebuild
Source: mustache.js
Version: 2.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20180502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
8 matches
Mail list logo