2018-05-11 10:23 GMT+02:00 Simon McVittie :
> On Fri, 11 May 2018 at 09:55:38 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> 2018-05-11 2:06 GMT+02:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
>> :
>> >
>> > It's starting to build now in one if the buildds, I hope
On Fri, 11 May 2018 at 09:55:38 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> 2018-05-11 2:06 GMT+02:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> :
> >
> > It's starting to build now in one if the buildds, I hope that tomorrow
> > we have the answer.
>
> It failed, log attached.
2018-05-11 2:06 GMT+02:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
:
>
> It's starting to build now in one if the buildds, I hope that tomorrow
> we have the answer.
It failed, log attached. This is the bit that failed:
==> debian/build-debug/test/test-refs.log <==
test-refs:
Hi,
2018-05-11 1:53 GMT+02:00 Simon McVittie :
> On Wed, 09 May 2018 at 17:56:01 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 May 2018 at 01:46:19 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> > So the build failed in other tests now.
>>
>> Based on these numbers I've tried a 20x
On Wed, 09 May 2018 at 17:56:01 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 05 May 2018 at 01:46:19 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> > So the build failed in other tests now.
>
> Based on these numbers I've tried a 20x multiplier for the timeouts on
> __riscv in my recent upload to
On Sat, 05 May 2018 at 01:46:19 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> So the build failed in other tests now.
Based on these numbers I've tried a 20x multiplier for the timeouts on
__riscv in my recent upload to experimental. I've also added better
logging for buildd builds, so that I
2018-05-04 0:49 GMT+02:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
:
> 2018-05-03 19:09 GMT+02:00 Simon McVittie :
>
>> Please could you try the build on a representative
>> riscv64 emulator with the attached hack, and send
>> the resulting
2018-05-03 19:09 GMT+02:00 Simon McVittie :
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Thu, 03 May 2018 at 16:30:19 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> This package fails to build for the riscv64 architecture, because these two
>> test
>> cases don't pass:
>>
>>
>>
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 03 May 2018 at 16:30:19 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> This package fails to build for the riscv64 architecture, because these two
> test
> cases don't pass:
>
>
>
Source: dbus
Version: 1.12.8-2
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
Hello,
This package fails to build for the riscv64 architecture, because these two test
cases don't pass:
10 matches
Mail list logo