Hi James,
> Uploaded.
… and processed :-)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 06:52:30AM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 09:24:33AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Chris Lamb wrote:
> >
> > > > Hint taken.. I have processed src:kitty in NEW (alas with a REJECT).
> > >
> > > Do let me know when you have re-uploaded.
> >
> > Gentle
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 09:24:33AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > > Hint taken.. I have processed src:kitty in NEW (alas with a REJECT).
> >
> > Do let me know when you have re-uploaded.
>
> Gentle ping on this? :)
The new upstream released happened a few days ago. I've
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Hint taken.. I have processed src:kitty in NEW (alas with a REJECT).
>
> Do let me know when you have re-uploaded.
Gentle ping on this? :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hint taken.. I have processed src:kitty in NEW (alas with a REJECT).
Do let me know when you have re-uploaded. :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Hi James,
> Thanks! Hopefully kitty will be through binary-NEW by the time this is
> released. :-)
Hint taken.. I have processed src:kitty in NEW (alas with a REJECT).
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018, 04:15 Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I think it's just the -T bit. There's already a --title, so it's not a
> > big leap to get the -T added. I just haven't gone upstream with it yet.
>
> I had a few moments so I just sent the following patch upstream:
>
>
forwarded 900704 https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/pull/659
tags 900704 + patch
thanks
Hi James,
> I think it's just the -T bit. There's already a --title, so it's not a
> big leap to get the -T added. I just haven't gone upstream with it yet.
I had a few moments so I just sent the
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 05:29:53PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > That's because it doesn't currently satisfy requirements of §11.8.3 of
> > Debian Policy for something providing x-terminal-emulator.
>
> This is:
>
>
>
Hi!
> That's because it doesn't currently satisfy requirements of §11.8.3 of
> Debian Policy for something providing x-terminal-emulator.
This is:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#packages-providing-a-terminal-emulator
Out of interest, which does it not satisfy right now?
James,
Thank you for the clarification and for the packaging!
Best,
florin
On 06/03/2018 08:45 PM, James McCoy wrote:
Control: severity -1 minor
On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 01:52:13PM -0400, Florin Iucha wrote:
After installing kitty and configuring it, I tried to set it up as my
default
Control: severity -1 minor
On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 01:52:13PM -0400, Florin Iucha wrote:
> After installing kitty and configuring it, I tried to set it up as my
> default x-terminal-emulator, using the following command:
>
>$ sudo update-alternatives --config x-terminal-emulator
>
>
Package: kitty
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
After installing kitty and configuring it, I tried to set it up as my
default x-terminal-emulator, using the following command:
$ sudo update-alternatives --config x-terminal-emulator
However, kitty was not present in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
