Hi Rainer
Am 05.11.18 um 10:43 schrieb Rainer Gerhards:
> Hi,
>
> Rainer from upstream here. Where is the missing lsof causing issues?
> That would probably be the right place to fix. I did a grep over the
> testbench and do not see any place where it is required (tests skip
> via 77 exit code
Hi,
Rainer from upstream here. Where is the missing lsof causing issues?
That would probably be the right place to fix. I did a grep over the
testbench and do not see any place where it is required (tests skip
via 77 exit code if not available).
Rainer
El dom., 4 nov. 2018 a las 22:57, Samuel
Michael Biebl, le dim. 04 nov. 2018 21:55:58 +0100, a ecrit:
> Am 04.11.18 um 18:48 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
>
> > Additionally, the attached patch is needed since lsof is non available
> > on non-linux.
>
> Is lsof not available at all or just provided by a different package?
It doesn't seem
Am 04.11.18 um 18:48 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Additionally, the attached patch is needed since lsof is non available
> on non-linux.
Is lsof not available at all or just provided by a different package?
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are
Hello,
Samuel Thibault, le mar. 12 juin 2018 00:35:15 +0200, a ecrit:
> Michael Biebl, le jeu. 07 juin 2018 13:40:45 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Am 07.06.2018 um 13:37 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > > Michael Biebl, le jeu. 07 juin 2018 13:34:48 +0200, a ecrit:
> > >> Anyway, such patches should best be
Hello,
Additionally, the attached patch is needed since lsof is non available
on non-linux.
Samuel
--- debian/control.original 2018-11-04 17:45:38.0 +
+++ debian/control 2018-11-04 17:46:03.0 +
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
python ,
Michael Biebl, le jeu. 07 juin 2018 13:40:45 +0200, a ecrit:
> Am 07.06.2018 um 13:37 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > Michael Biebl, le jeu. 07 juin 2018 13:34:48 +0200, a ecrit:
> >> Anyway, such patches should best be sent upstream.
> >
> > We don't have the manpower to chase all upstream
Am 07.06.2018 um 13:37 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Michael Biebl, le jeu. 07 juin 2018 13:34:48 +0200, a ecrit:
>> Anyway, such patches should best be sent upstream.
>
> We don't have the manpower to chase all upstream bugtrackers and
> whatnot.
Same is true for me. I don't have the man power to
Am 07.06.2018 um 13:31 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Michael Biebl, le jeu. 07 juin 2018 13:26:26 +0200, a ecrit:
>> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 00:50:26 +0200 Samuel Thibault
>> wrote:
>>> Package: rsyslog
>>> Version: 8.34.0-1
>>> Severity: important
>>> Tags: patch
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> rsyslog currently
Michael Biebl, le jeu. 07 juin 2018 13:26:26 +0200, a ecrit:
> If we are going to use PATH_MAX anyway as well for hurd,
As a side note: rsyslog is actually already using an arbitrary value in
its Load() function, so I'm not introducing a new oddity.
The problem with PATH_MAX really is that
Michael Biebl, le jeu. 07 juin 2018 13:34:48 +0200, a ecrit:
> Anyway, such patches should best be sent upstream.
We don't have the manpower to chase all upstream bugtrackers and
whatnot.
Samuel
Michael Biebl, le jeu. 07 juin 2018 13:26:26 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 00:50:26 +0200 Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> > Package: rsyslog
> > Version: 8.34.0-1
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > rsyslog currently FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to unconditional uses of
>
Hi Samuel
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 00:50:26 +0200 Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Package: rsyslog
> Version: 8.34.0-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Hello,
>
> rsyslog currently FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to unconditional uses of
> PATH_MAX. Here is a patch fixing it.
>
If we are going to use
Package: rsyslog
Version: 8.34.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hello,
rsyslog currently FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to unconditional uses of
PATH_MAX. Here is a patch fixing it.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500,
14 matches
Mail list logo
