Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 15:19:25 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> > It's a matter of someone fixing the code. It seems Igor Scheller is
> > happy to work on it, he just needs a way forward, not being only told
> > that what is currently there is nonsense.
>
> Well, using
Samuel Thibault writes:
> It's a matter of someone fixing the code. It seems Igor Scheller is
> happy to work on it, he just needs a way forward, not being only told
> that what is currently there is nonsense.
Well, using fe80::1 as default gateway would not be a problem if it
weren't for the
Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 14:12:28 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault writes:
> > Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 13:30:39 +0200, a ecrit:
> >> But this will:
> >>
> >> frtest3:~# ip route add 2001:db8:f00::1/128 dev eth1
> >
> > So this is a route, which can be checked for.
>
> No, it
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 13:30:39 +0200, a ecrit:
>> But this will:
>>
>> frtest3:~# ip route add 2001:db8:f00::1/128 dev eth1
>
> So this is a route, which can be checked for.
No, it is a route you can safely add. Checking for it is no point. It
does not
Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 13:30:39 +0200, a ecrit:
> But this will:
>
> frtest3:~# ip route add 2001:db8:f00::1/128 dev eth1
So this is a route, which can be checked for.
> > which is the point of the test AIUI.
>
> The test is pointless. There is absolutely no requirement that the
>
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 10:52:30 +0200, a ecrit:
>> Huh? What is this? There is no "gateway must be in subnet" requirement
>> in IPv6. The gateway must only be reachable, which means that you must
>> be able to resolve the L2 address using ND.
>
> Before
Igor Scheller, le mar. 12 juin 2018 11:28:58 +0200, a ecrit:
> Imho it could be a better option to just configure the interface and
> test if something is reachable?
"something" is the problem. We do test for reachability of the mirror
anyway.
But again, checking that there actually is a route
Bjørn Mork, le mar. 12 juin 2018 10:52:30 +0200, a ecrit:
> Huh? What is this? There is no "gateway must be in subnet" requirement
> in IPv6. The gateway must only be reachable, which means that you must
> be able to resolve the L2 address using ND.
Before that, you need a route, which is the
On 6/10/18 7:25 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Igor Scheller, le dim. 10 juin 2018 18:57:50 +0200, a ecrit:
>> When I try to configure fe80::1 (next router) as a gateway in an IPv6 only
>> network the installer stops with an "Unreachable gateway" error.
>>
>> Looking at
Igor Scheller, le dim. 10 juin 2018 18:57:50 +0200, a ecrit:
> When I try to configure fe80::1 (next router) as a gateway in an IPv6 only
> network the installer stops with an "Unreachable gateway" error.
>
> Looking at netcfg-common.c:netcfg_gateway_reachable its checked by comparing
> bytes.
Package: netcfg-static
Severity: normal
Tags: ipv6
When I try to configure fe80::1 (next router) as a gateway in an IPv6 only
network the installer stops with an "Unreachable gateway" error.
Looking at netcfg-common.c:netcfg_gateway_reachable its checked by comparing
bytes. Imho a better way
11 matches
Mail list logo
