Bug#901416: Suggests: apparmor-profiles-extra is insufficient

2018-10-27 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri: > s/Apparmor/AppArmor/ :) There was another similar typo, attached patch fixes both. Cheers, -- intrigeri >From 97cbdd10a4f9af31d78136a1f1c76f2a4126b806 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: intrigeri Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 09:34:33 + Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Fix spelling of "AppArmor". -

Bug#901416: Suggests: apparmor-profiles-extra is insufficient

2018-10-27 Thread intrigeri
Control: severity -1 serious Hi Matthew & Reiner! Due to this bug, merely installing the surf package on a default Debian testing/sid system breaks unrelated functionality, which is RC ⇒ bumping severity. FYI I'll file another bug today about an incompatibility of the shipped AppArmor policy wit

Bug#901416: Suggests: apparmor-profiles-extra is insufficient

2018-10-27 Thread intrigeri
Control: severity -1 normal intrigeri: > Due to this bug, merely installing the surf package on a default > Debian testing/sid system breaks unrelated functionality, which is RC > ⇒ bumping severity. I was wrong: failure to load one AppArmor profile only affects this profile, but the rest of the

Bug#901416: Suggests: apparmor-profiles-extra is insufficient

2018-10-27 Thread Reiner Herrmann
Hi intrigeri, thank you for your surf patches! I'm a bit hesitant to introduce a new binary package for the AppArmor profile. What do you think about dropping/commenting the gstreamer part of the profile, so there is no longer a dependency to apparmor-profiles-extra. This would break some sites w

Bug#901416: Suggests: apparmor-profiles-extra is insufficient

2018-10-28 Thread intrigeri
Hi Reiner, Reiner Herrmann: > thank you for your surf patches! My pleasure :) > I'm a bit hesitant to introduce a new binary package for the AppArmor > profile. Understood, I'm too. > What do you think about dropping/commenting the gstreamer part of the > profile, so there is no longer a depen