On 17/06/18 17:38, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +patch
>
> Here's a patch.
>
> I find upstream's decision to not default to --reflink=auto weird. Not
> reflinking when it's supported is harmful: the stated reason of "resiliency"
> against disk failures is bogus: common types of failur
Control: tags -1 +patch
Here's a patch.
I find upstream's decision to not default to --reflink=auto weird. Not
reflinking when it's supported is harmful: the stated reason of "resiliency"
against disk failures is bogus: common types of failure don't work this way.
Neither does "guaranteeing dis
2 matches
Mail list logo
