Control: tag -1 pending
Hi Cyril,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:50:28PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Andreas B. Mundt (2018-06-22):
> > Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I worked out a minimal
> > patch that fixes the issue.
>
> From a quick look, that should be fine; feel free to
Hi Andreas,
Andreas B. Mundt (2018-06-22):
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I worked out a minimal
> patch that fixes the issue.
From a quick look, that should be fine; feel free to push (with a
changelog entry), thanks!
> However, it would be interesting to know why armhf uses
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi Cyril,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 06:48:34PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: d-i
>
> (No need for this tag for d-i and debs/udebs maintained by debian-boot@;
> we tend to use it for pieces not directly linked to us.)
Ah, thanks for info and f
Control: tag -1 - d-i
Hi Andreas,
Andreas B. Mundt (2018-06-21):
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: d-i
(No need for this tag for d-i and debs/udebs maintained by debian-boot@;
we tend to use it for pieces not directly linked to us.)
> when comparing netboot.tar.gz images
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
Hi,
when comparing netboot.tar.gz images for different architectures, I
noticed a difference in the structure of the archives. For the armhf
netboot archive [1], I get:
$ tar tzf netboot_armhf.tar.gz
debian-installer/armhf/tftpboot.sc
5 matches
Mail list logo
