On 28/01/2022 22:10, Matija Nalis wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 08:32:25PM +, Peter wrote:
-k--build-id
is an answer to getting dbgsym packages,
however I tried it out with c-evo and it is breaking reproducible build.
Looks like the build ID is a random string, so the two builds differ.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 08:32:25PM +, Peter wrote:
> -k--build-id
> is an answer to getting dbgsym packages,
> however I tried it out with c-evo and it is breaking reproducible build.
> Looks like the build ID is a random string, so the two builds differ.
Does it build reproducibily *without*
-k--build-id
is an answer to getting dbgsym packages,
however I tried it out with c-evo and it is breaking reproducible build.
Looks like the build ID is a random string, so the two builds differ.
Maybe not a good idea for etc/fpc.cfg ?
Cheers,
Peter
[Oops, now with submitter in the To:.]
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, 03 Jul 2018 01:25:06 +0300 Alexander Kernozhitsky
wrote:
> Package: fpc
> Version: 3.0.4+dfsg-19
> Severity: wishlist
>
> For many packages, there are dbgsym packages. Now it's present mostly for
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, 03 Jul 2018 01:25:06 +0300 Alexander Kernozhitsky
wrote:
> Package: fpc
> Version: 3.0.4+dfsg-19
> Severity: wishlist
>
> For many packages, there are dbgsym packages. Now it's present mostly for
> packages built with GCC. I think it will be a
Package: fpc
Version: 3.0.4+dfsg-19
Severity: wishlist
For many packages, there are dbgsym packages. Now it's present mostly for
packages built with GCC. I think it will be a good idea to provide dbgsym
packages for programs built with FPC.
--- System information. ---
Architecture:
Kernel:
6 matches
Mail list logo