Hi Fabian,
That's a good point; I'm not sure about this, though, as I don't want
to suggest that this is a different font - it isn't, it's just a DFSG
packaging of the same font.
If there's a trademark issue, though, then of course that's a
different matter.
Best wishes,
Julian
On Sun, Jan
Hi Nathan,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:46:46PM +, Nathan Willis wrote:
> Please don't take the following info as stop-energy (which it's not), but
> there
> is already an active project doing the task of liberating the no-longer-free
> symbols from Font Awesome, called ForkAwesome:
>
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:21 PM Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:21:29PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Julian Gilbey (2023-01-29 12:03:30)
> > > If you would like me to go ahead and work on this, please say.
> >
> > Sure I would like you to go ahead - why would I
02...@bugs.debian.org, Bastian Germann Betreff: Bug#902981:
Font Awesome v5 in Debian On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:21:29PM +0100, Jonas
Smedegaard wrote:> Quoting Julian Gilbey (2023-01-29 12:03:30)> > If you would
like me to go ahead and work on this, please say.> > Sure I would
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:21:29PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Julian Gilbey (2023-01-29 12:03:30)
> > If you would like me to go ahead and work on this, please say.
>
> Sure I would like you to go ahead - why would I not want that?
>
> Sounds like a fun project, and Free, and
Quoting Julian Gilbey (2023-01-29 12:03:30)
> If you would like me to go ahead and work on this, please say.
Sure I would like you to go ahead - why would I not want that?
Sounds like a fun project, and Free, and beneficial to Debian.
One thing you might consider is to name the resulting
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 04:47:35PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Bastian Germann (2023-01-24 16:28:59)
> > [...]
> > When you search Debian it turns out, Font Awesome 5 is around in A LOT of
> > packages.
> > A good starting point is
> >
Quoting Bastian Germann (2023-01-24 16:28:59)
> X-Debbugs-Cc: sebas...@xs4all.nl
>
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:31:55 -0400 Alexandre Viau wrote:
> > For software to be considered to be included in Debian, it must be free
> > software. We try to evaluate whether or not something is free software
>
X-Debbugs-Cc: sebas...@xs4all.nl
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:31:55 -0400 Alexandre Viau wrote:
For software to be considered to be included in Debian, it must be free
software. We try to evaluate whether or not something is free software
by using the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG)[1].
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 5:45 AM Rob Madole wrote:
> if our build tool is required we can’t provide that.
Could you provide some details about why this is? It might be that we
can offer some ideas for ways forward if given more information.
For example you could adopt a new build toolchain for
On Sep 27, 2018, 4:31 PM -0500, Alexandre Viau , wrote:
>
> Is there something that could be done so that Font-Awesome v5 can match
> this interpretation of what is free software?
Ah, thanks for summarizing for me, Alexandre. There isn’t anything more we can
do at the moment. While the license
On 2018-09-27 5:11 p.m., Rob Madole wrote:
I’m one of the core developers on the Font Awesome project. I can
answer any specific questions and I’ll try and help where I can.
Thank you for getting in touch!
Probably the first question to get out of the way is: “Will Font
Awesome open source
12 matches
Mail list logo
