Am 15.07.2018 um 18:14 schrieb Richard Laager:
> On 07/15/2018 04:22 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Fwiw, I think it would be better if ntpsec and ntp would not use the
>> same service file name and if ntpsec would use ntpsec.service instead.
>
> Are you willing to explain your reasoning? Specificall
On 07/15/2018 04:22 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Fwiw, I think it would be better if ntpsec and ntp would not use the
> same service file name and if ntpsec would use ntpsec.service instead.
Are you willing to explain your reasoning? Specifically, is it because
of these issues, or would you take the
Am 15.07.2018 um 04:51 schrieb Richard Laager:
> Package: init-system-helpers
> Version: 1.51
> Severity: important
>
> If two packages ship the same unit, `deb-systemd-helper purge` is
> problematic. For example, the packages "ntp" and "ntpsec" both provide
> a unit called "ntp.service". (I am t
Package: init-system-helpers
Version: 1.51
Severity: important
If two packages ship the same unit, `deb-systemd-helper purge` is
problematic. For example, the packages "ntp" and "ntpsec" both provide
a unit called "ntp.service". (I am the maintainer of ntpsec.)
dh_systemd_enable adds this to the
4 matches
Mail list logo
