Hello Paul and lintian maintainers,
Paul Gevers [2018-07-30 21:37 +0200]:
> Please, update your autopkgtest to actually test the binary package(s)
> as installed. You're welcome to have this test *additionally* to actual
> tests.
I don't really see much point in explicitly encouraging /bin/true t
tags 905030 + pending
thanks
Implemented in Git, pending upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/bce0c1fb542a5efedd56bb07348ebb09d1c39003
checks/testsuite.desc | 16
checks/testsuite.pm | 4
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 17:57:07 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 31-07-18 16:55, Chris Lamb wrote:
> >> Rather unconstructively, they refuse to fix it until lintian has the
> >> warning [2].
> >
> > That seems.. strange. At the very least, Lintian is not Policy.
But lintian is the reason that the autop
Hi Chris,
On 31-07-18 16:55, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> Rather unconstructively, they refuse to fix it until lintian has the
>> warning [2].
>
> That seems.. strange. At the very least, Lintian is not Policy.
Ack. I filed 6 bugs today against packages in their team (the ones
currently trying to migrat
Hi Paul,
> Rather unconstructively, they refuse to fix it until lintian has the
> warning [2].
That seems.. strange. At the very least, Lintian is not Policy.
Unrelated to the above, do you feel there any real fear that a /bin/
true would simply be replaced with something else if a maintainer sa
> >> For this proposal to make sense, all deployed autopkgtests must
> >> actually test the package involved to some extent.
> >
> > I fully ACK and understand the issue and background but just to be more
> > effective priority-wise are you aware of how many packages, if any,
> > are violating thi
Hi Chris,
On 31-07-18 05:16, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> For this proposal to make sense, all deployed autopkgtests must
>> actually test the package involved to some extent.
>
> I fully ACK and understand the issue and background but just to be more
> effective priority-wise are you aware of how many p
Hi Paul,
> For this proposal to make sense, all deployed autopkgtests must
> actually test the package involved to some extent.
I fully ACK and understand the issue and background but just to be more
effective priority-wise are you aware of how many packages, if any,
are violating this right now?
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.93
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: issue
Dear lintian maintainers,
The Release Team has expressed their wish [1] that autopkgtest does not
simply contain /bin/true as test command:
"""
For this prop
9 matches
Mail list logo
