On 9/27/18 3:07 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Is this in the form you would send it upstream? I'd prefer it in the
> form of the individual patches you'd send upstream, rather than one
> big patch per architecture - that'll mean you don't have to prepare two
> different versions, and I don't have to
Control: tags 905834 + patch moreinfo
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 11:10:19 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Please always CC debian-$a...@lists.debian.org in the future.
Sorry, I thought I had - I must have missed it for that particular bug.
> Anyway, attaching an updated patch for m68k.
Package: src:mozjs60
Followup-For: Bug #905834
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: m68k
Hello!
I wasn't put in the loop of this bug report, so I was about to
file a new bug report. Luckily, reportbug listed this bug before
I filed a new one. Please always CC debian-$a...@lists.debian.org
Source: mozjs52
Severity: wishlist
Tags: help
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: m68k
(I'm reporting this as a mozjs52 bug since mozjs60 isn't available in the
archive yet; I'll reassign it to mozjs60 when available.)
mozjs60 is almost ready for upload to NEW. However, I had to drop the
4 matches
Mail list logo
