Hi,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:12:29PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > We do that to get the last used compression type. If we do a ls-tree
> > or even `pristine-tar list` we have no ordering.
>
> Interesting. I was imagining (without
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:28:47PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> Yeah, exactly. There are some external uses and we don't want to break
> API for them.
Aha!
OK, here's a new patch which does what you suggest.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> We do that to get the last used compression type. If we do a ls-tree
> or even `pristine-tar list` we have no ordering.
Interesting. I was imagining (without checking!) that you'd be
interested in the compression a particular file
control: -1 tags -patch
Hi Ian,
Thanks!
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:38:22AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
[..snip..]
> Don't let this stop you from merging the commit (I don't know if I'll
> have time to write this patch soon if it's the right idea and I have the
> other one already which works), but
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.9.9
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hey,
[ as spoilered over private email ;-) ]
We currently grep the log of the pristine-tar branch to find out which
compression type the tarball we're interested in has. The regex we use
to do that fails when it encounters
5 matches
Mail list logo
