Source: systemd
Version: 239-7
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
Hi,
This package fails to build in riscv64 due to timeout of the tests (it varies,
but it's often around 5 test cases of the current ~300).
systemd is one of the two remaini
Hi again,
2018-08-17 16:24 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
[...]
To try to address it, I first tried to increase the timeout only for the riscv64
architecture, with this recipe in debian/rules (the lines added and commented
out):
+++ systemd
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 23:07:39 +0200 "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo"
wrote:
> So perhaps debian/rules should be changed to use "meson test" instead,
> as Meson upstream recommended, and so we can pass on the "-t 10" for
> riscv64.
I would prefer this approach
Ideally this would be split into two
Am 22.10.18 um 21:15 schrieb Karsten Merker:
> may I ping you on the merge request above? It would be great
> if it could be merged soon as that would resolve a large
> roadblock for the Debian riscv64 port.
If this is a pressing issue, you might want to consider adding
"nocheck" to your build env
Hi,
2018-09-04 22:44 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 23:07:39 +0200 "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo"
> wrote:
>
>> So perhaps debian/rules should be changed to use "meson test" instead,
>> as Meson upstream recommended, and so we can pass on the "-t 10" for
>> riscv64.
>
> I would
Em sáb, 29 de set de 2018 às 01:32, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
escreveu:
>
> Submitted merge request:
> https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/merge_requests/17
>
> Not tested, but will do during the weekend and will report back.
I have modified it slightly from the 1st version that I s
6 matches
Mail list logo
