On Fri 2018-08-24 09:05:03 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I guess I was misguided by too many gnupg doc dirs. Since
> /usr/bin/gpg <- gpg package
> /usr/bin/gpg2 <- gnupg2 package
> I obviously only checked
> /usr/share/doc/ ->
> gnupg2
> gpg
> bu
Hi Daniel,
>gnupg: /usr/share/doc/gnupg/DETAILS.gz
Indeed (I should have used dlocate, sorry for that!).
> I'm closing this report as it seems to be handled already, but if you
> have any suggestions for how to improve the packaging otherwise, feel
I guess I was misguided by too many gnupg
Thanks for the report, Norbert!
On Thu 2018-08-23 08:52:42 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Package: gnupg2
> Version: 2.2.9-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear all,
>
> We are using Gpg for distribution release signing and verification of
> TeX Live, and to properly respond to all kind of events like e
Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.2.9-1
Severity: normal
Dear all,
We are using Gpg for distribution release signing and verification of
TeX Live, and to properly respond to all kind of events like expired
keys/signatures, it is necessary to parse the --status-fd/file
output of gpg.
The format of the s
4 matches
Mail list logo
