Bug#908137: luajit: lightuserdata problem with > 47 bit address space on arm64

2020-12-18 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 patch pending NMU uploaded in sid G. On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 13:57:12 +0200 Santiago Ruano =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rinc=F3n?= wrote: > Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream > > On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:54:30 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Source: luajit > > Version: 2.0.4+dfsg-1 > > Severity:

Bug#908137: luajit: lightuserdata problem with > 47 bit address space on arm64

2020-10-05 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:54:30 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: luajit > Version: 2.0.4+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > Forwarded: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/230#issuecomment-260205661 > > This is an RFC regarding what to do for avoiding runtime >

Bug#908137: luajit: lightuserdata problem with > 47 bit address space on arm64

2018-09-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: luajit Version: 2.0.4+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Forwarded: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/230#issuecomment-260205661 This is an RFC regarding what to do for avoiding runtime problems on arm64 like e.g. #907729. The big hammer would be to drop luajit on arm64, reverse dependencies