On 9/9/18 12:12 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> How much of a problem is the nocheck issue that might warrant bumping
> the severity of this Lintian tag? If you feel it deserves a "W:" please
> file a wishlist bug against src:lintian.
It should be bumped because a working "nocheck" is required for
On 9/9/18 12:09 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> You need to guard this with:
>>
>> ifeq ($(filter nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),)
>
> FYI this omission can be detected by Lintian:
>
>
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/override_dh_auto_test-does-not-check-DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.html
Oh, that's very cool!
Hi Adrian,
> > FYI this omission can be detected by Lintian:
[…]
> Oh, that's very cool! Thanks for implementing that.
>
> Now we can finally start digging for affected packages directly
> and fix them.
How much of a problem is the nocheck issue that might warrant bumping
the severity of this
Hi,
> You need to guard this with:
>
> ifeq ($(filter nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),)
FYI this omission can be detected by Lintian:
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/override_dh_auto_test-does-not-check-DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.html
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'`
Source: gdk-pixbuf
Version: 2.38.0+dfsg-3
Severity: normal
Hello!
Since version 2.38.0+dfsg-2, gdk-pixbuf is ignoring "nocheck" in
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS which means the testsuite is always run which
means it's no longer to cross-build the package as the testsuite
can only run during native builds.
5 matches
Mail list logo
