Bug#909523: Intent to NMU (Re: Bug#909523: Default configuration is incompatible with a non-SELinux active LSM)

2019-07-19 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Saturday, 20 July 2019 1:09:11 AM AEST intrigeri wrote: > Done (0.10.10-0.2). This was my first attempt at using dgit to NMU so > let's hope I did not bork it. > > I'm attaching the 3 commits I did on top of 0.10.10-0.1. Awesome, thank you. I've just realised that we had no _cachefilesd_ on

Bug#909523: Intent to NMU (Re: Bug#909523: Default configuration is incompatible with a non-SELinux active LSM)

2019-07-19 Thread intrigeri
Hi, intrigeri: > Dmitry Smirnov: >>> If one of you feels responsible for maintaining this package but >>> temporarily lacks time, I (or one of the attendees to one of the many >>> upcoming BSPs) will gladly fix this with a NMU. >> Please, please. That would be really nice if you could. Thanks.

Bug#909523: Intent to NMU (Re: Bug#909523: Default configuration is incompatible with a non-SELinux active LSM)

2018-12-17 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Dmitry Smirnov: > IMHO something that is so easy to fix hardly qualifies for severity > "serious"... To fix this a user needs to first guess that the problem is related to AppArmor and then find a workaround (either a way to fully disable AppArmor, which causes unfortunate regressions