Hi,
> To avoid yet another one, it would be awesome, if you Ralf or you Tomas,
> could raise this issue with the libvirt and docker maintainer and file a
> corresponding Debian bug report and tell me the bug numer
> I would then file a Debian bug against firewalld for switching the
> backend back
Hi everyone!
Eric, thanks a lot for your reply.
Since I don't know, how long it will take for docker and libvirt to have
better firewalld/nftables integration the the feature freeze for Debian
stretch is not too far away, let's go back to the iptables backend,
especially after the reassurence
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/397
Am 25.09.18 um 16:33 schrieb Tomas Janousek:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:25:25PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Could you raise this upstream please at
>> https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/
>
> Yep.
>
>
3 matches
Mail list logo